Change of International Law: Rules of Change and Changing Rules (Online & In-Person)
The TRICI-Law project and the University of Groningen’s Department of Transboundary Legal Studies have the pleasure to invite you to a workshop on ‘Change in International Law: Rules of Change and Changing Rules’ which will take place at the ‘Old Courtroom’ of the University of Groningen on 30 September 2022, from 10am – 5pm.
The conference will form part of the research conducted by the project ‘The Rules of Interpretation of Customary International Law’ (TRICI-Law). This project has received funding from the European Research Council (‘ERC’) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (Grant Agreement No. 759728).
BlueJeans Link for online attendees
Themes of the Workshop
International law, much like any law, sits at the centre of a tug of war between competing forces; stability and change, motion and rest. On the one hand, it needs to accommodate the need for stability and predictability that is essential to any legal system. On the other hand, it needs to remain responsive to the exigencies of an ever-changing world, lest it loses its relevance and becomes obsolete. It is noteworthy that, according to H.L.A. Hart, the rules by which other rules are altered (rules of change) are a marked feature and indispensable condition of any legal system. But what are the rules that govern the change of rules of international law?
This question inevitably brings to the fore the regulation of change within the body of rules and principles that comprise the theory of sources of international law. As far as treaties are concerned, the Vienna Convention on the Law of the Treaties enumerates various formal ways in which treaty rules can change: modification, amendment, or termination. Yet, when it comes to many important treaty rules, like those provided in broadly ratified multilateral treaties, procedures on change are cumbersome, politically unrealistic, and termination runs the risk of regression. In practice, change in the content of treaty provisions comes about predominantly through its constant (re)interpretation by states, international organisations, international courts and tribunals, and other actors. To illustrate this point, almost forty years after the adoption of the VCLT, the ILC decided the inclusion of the topic ‘Treaties over Time’
in its programme of work alluding to the notion of rules of change in the law of treaties.1 However, the practical prevalence of interpretation in bringing about change is such that the ILC decided eventually to limit the scope of its study and final output to the topic of ‘Subsequent Agreements and Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties’.2 How does the rule of interpretation enable change of treaty rules? And, does the rule of interpretation strike an adequate balance between stability and change, predictability and evolution, in the context of determination of treaty rules? Has the rule of interpretation itself evolved, or should it evolve, as a result of the tension between stability and change?
When it comes to the other principal sources of international law, customary international law and general principles of law, the issue of change remains relatively underexplored. In recent years, the ILC has set about to study the rules relating to the identification of customary international law, general principles of law, and jus cogens.3 Yet, it is remarkable that the Commission implicitly or implicitly excluded for the most part the issue of change from the remit of its works and final outputs. What are the rules governing change of unwritten international law, if any? The dominant account is that rules of unwritten international law can only be changed either by a subsequent rule of the same pedigree or that they constantly evolve. By implication, rules of unwritten international law might appear virtually unchangeable once formed or merely transient in the sense that they never fully form. Is there a way to strike a better balance between stability and change? How is change determined in the content of rules of unwritten international law? Is there a role for processes akin to interpretation in the law of treaties?
The regulation of change in the theory of sources of international law, or the lack thereof, brings to the fore a plethora of questions. Which actors stand to benefit or lose from this configuration? What is the role of international judges in bringing about change of rules of international law and what are the limitations, if any, of this function? Are rules of change necessary or desirable from a normative perspective and, if so, how should they look like?
This workshop aims to map out and assess the rules and principles that govern the change of rules of international law including through interpretation. To this end, it invites contributions which elucidate the processes that drive change of rules of international law within the framework of sources of international law. It also welcomes contributions which offer normative, empirical, or critical perspectives as to how international law can or should be addressing the issue of change.
Schedule *Amsterdam Time Zone (CET) (UTC+01:00)
|10.00-10.30||Registration & Coffee|
|10.30-11.00||Opening Remarks: Panos Merkouris & Sotirios Ioannis Lekkas (TRICI-Law)|
|11.00-13.00||Panel I: Rules of Change in the Theory of Sources of International Law|
Chair: Brigit Toebes (University of Groningen)
Christina Binder (Universität der Bundeswehr München) ‘Change
and the Law of Treaties: Or Means and Limits to Accommodate
Dire Tladi (University of Pretoria; International Law Commission)
‘Change and Peremptory Norms of General International Law’
Katie Johnston (University of Liverpool) ‘Changing custom:
identification of state practice and opinio juris in the context of
existing customary international law’
|14.30-16.30||Panel II: CIL Interpretation as a Tool in the Normative Development of International Law|
Chair: Ramses Wessel (University of Groningen)
Fuad Zarbiyev (Graduate Institute of International and Development
Studies) ‘Are Joint Treaty Interpretations Controlling? The Changing
Legal Regime of Authentic Treaty Interpretation’
Thomas Kleinlein (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena) ‘Change of
Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens)’
Enzo Cannizzaro (Università di Roma “La Sapienza”) ‘Evolution by
|18.00||Workshop Dinner (For Conference Organisers, Speakers, & Chairs only)|
The Conference is co-organised by the ERC project on ‘The Rules of Interpretation of Customary International Law’ (TRICI-Law project, University of Groningen), at the Department of Transboundary Legal Studies of the University of Groningen. This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (Grant Agreement No. 759728). PluriCourts is funded by the Research Council of Norway, project number 223274.