Skip to content
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
TRICI-Law – The Rules of Interpretation of Customary International Law

TRICI-Law – The Rules of Interpretation of Customary International Law

  • Home
  • About
    • The Project
    • The Team
  • Research
    • WP1: Interpretation
      • Domestic Courts
    • WP2: Judicial Practice
    • WP3: Rules of Interpretation
    • WP4: Articles & Guidelines
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • Workshops
  • Publications
    • Research Paper Series
    • Blogs
  • Media
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Images
  • News
  • Contact

TRICI-Law Research Paper Series


  • 2020

    Paper Series 001/2020 Marina Fortuna / Different Strings of the Same Harp: Interpretation of Customary International Rules, their Identification and Treaty Interpretation

  • Paper Series 002/2020 Sotirios-Ioannis Lekkas / The Uses of the Work of the International Law Commission on State Responsibility in International Investment Arbitration: Maintaining the Unity of the Law of State Responsibility through Interpretation?

  • Paper Series 003/2020 Marina Fortuna / Customary International Law as an Object of Scrutiny and an Interpretative Aid (obs. ECtHR, 9 july 2019, Volodina v Russia, N° 41261/17 and ECtHR, GC, 29 January 2019, Güzelyurtlu and Others v Cyprus and Turkey, N° 36925/07)

  • Paper Series 004/2020 Panos Merkouris / Time-Travelling Rules of Interpretation: Of “Time-Will” and “Time-Bubbles”

  • Paper Series 005/2020 Panos Merkouris & Sotirios-Ioannis Lekkas / Reservations to Treaties

  • Paper Series 006/2020 Panos Merkouris / The Principle of Systemic Integration

  • Paper Series 007/2020 Photini Pazartzis & Panos Merkouris / Final Report on the UN Human Rights Committee and other Human Rights Treaty Bodies

  • Paper Series 008/2020 Panos Merkouris & Daniel Peat / Final Report: The Interpretative Practice of the PCIJ/ICJ

  • Paper Series 009/2020 Photini Pazartzis, Geir Ulfstein, Panos Merkouris & Daniel Peat / Final Report of the ILA Study Group on the Content and Evolution of the Rules of Interpretation

  • 2019

    Paper Series 002/2019 Panos Merkouris / Termination of Treaties: The Contribution of the Gabčikovo- Nagymaros Judgment

  • Paper Series 003/2019 Panos Merkouris / Treaty Interpretation and its Rules: Of Motion through Time, ‘Time-Will’ and ‘Time-Bubbles’

  • Paper Series 004/2019 Nina Mileva / The Under-representation of Third World States in Customary International Law: Can Interpretation Bridge the Gap?

  • Paper Series 005/2019 Nina Mileva / The Role of Domestic Courts in the Interpretation of Customary International Law: How can we Learn from Domestic Interpretive Practices?

  • Paper Series 006/2019 Cedric Ryngaert / Customary International Law Interpretation: The Role of Domestic Courts

  • Paper Series 007/2019 Diego Mejía-Lemos / Custom and the Regulation of ‘the Sources of International Law’

  • Paper Series 008/2019 Kostiantyn Gorobets / Practical Reasoning and Interpretation of Customary International Law

  • Paper Series 009/2019 Riccardo Di Marco / Customary International Law: a Foreword to Identification v. Interpretation

  • Paper Series 010/2019 Letizia Lo Giacco / Eureka! On Courts’ Discretion in ‘Ascertaining’ Rules of Customary International Law

  • Paper Series 011/2019 Anna Irene Baka / The Logic of Absence in Customary International Law

  • Paper Series 012/2019 Andreas Hadjigeorgiou / Beyond Formalism: Reviving the Legacy of Sir Henry Maine for CIL

  • 2018

    Paper Series 001/2018 Panos Merkouris / Interpreting the Rules of Customary International Law

  • Paper Series 002/2018 Fay Pazartzis, Geir Ulfstein, Panos Merkouris & Daniel Peat / Interim Report on the Content and Evolution of the Rules of Interpretation

  • Paper Series 003/2018 Panos Merkouris & Daniel Peat / Preliminary Report on the Interpretative Practice of the PCIJ/ICJ

  • Paper Series 004/2018 Fay Pazartzis & Panos Merkouris / Preliminary Report on the Interpretative Practice of the Human Rights Committee and Other UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies

  • Paper Series 005/2018 Panos Merkouris / In Dubio Mitius

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Visit the official University of Groningen TRICI-Law Project website


                                             

This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No759728).

Powered by WordPress.com.
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: