- New Research Paper from Team Member Dr. Sotirios-Ioannis LekkasThe TRICI-Law team is excited to announce that Dr. Sotirios-Ioannis Lekkas’ latest research paper, entitled ‘The Uses of the Work of the International Law Commission on State Responsibility in International Investment Arbitration: Maintaining the Unity of the Law of StateResponsibility through Interpretation?‘ is now available on the TRICI-Law website. Abstract: The Articles on State Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts (‘ARSIWA’) constitute an experiment in international law-making. Unlike other successful projects of the International Law Commission … Continue reading New Research Paper from Team Member Dr. Sotirios-Ioannis Lekkas
- Are You Following TRICI-Law?The TRICI-Law project has been expanding its digital footprint! For the most up to date TRICI-Law experience, check us out on the following platforms: Social media Facebook Twitter LinkedIn podcASTS Apple Podcasts Spotify Google Podcasts Videos YouTube
- TRICI-Law PI’s Article on the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Judgment Published in BookProf. Panos Merkouris, PI of the TRICI-Law project, recent had an article published in a collected book entitled ‘The Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Judgment and Its Contribution to the Development of International Law‘. The book, edited by Serena Forlati, Makane Moïse Mbengue, and Brian McGarry, ‘offers a comprehensive analysis of both the management of this case and the substantive legal issues at stake. It also reappraises the Court’s findings in light of subsequent developments in the international legal … Continue reading TRICI-Law PI’s Article on the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Judgment Published in Book
- Principal Investigator, Prof. Panos Merkouris Co-Publishes Book on ‘Treaties in Motion’Principal Investigator of the TRICI-Law project, Prof. Panos Merkouris, has co-published a book alongside Prof. Malgosia Fitzmaurice entitled ‘Treaties in Motion’, which can be found here. The law of treaties is in constant motion, understood not only as locomotion, but also as motion through time and as change. Thus, kinesis and stasis, two sides of the same concept of ‘motion’, are the central themes of Treaties in Motion. The concept of motion adopted in this … Continue reading Principal Investigator, Prof. Panos Merkouris Co-Publishes Book on ‘Treaties in Motion’
- TRICI-Law Workshop & Conference Postponed Due to COVID-19Due to the ongoing global situation with regard to COVID-19, the TRICI-Law team has decided to postpone both our May 22 2020 Workshop ‘Interpretation in International Law: Rules, Content, and Evolution’ and 23-24 September 2020 conference on ‘Custom and International Investment Law.’ New dates will be announced in the future and abstracts are currently under review. We thank you for your patience during these interesting times.
- Panel 5.2.3 / Nikolaos Voulgaris / The Genesis of Customary International Law through the International Law Commission; Disentangling lex ferenda from lex lata
- Panel 5.2.2 / Letizia Lo Giacco / Eureka! On Courts’ Discretion in ‘Ascertaining’ Rules of Customary International Law
- Panel 5.2.1 / Vladyslav Lanovoy / The Role of International Courts and Tribunals in the Treatment of Customary International Law: A Plea for Greater Methodological Rigour
- Panel 5.1.4 / Marina Fortuna / Interpretation of Customary International Law: You Know It When You See It?
- Panel 5.1.3 / Kostiantyn Gorobets / Practical Reasoning and Interpretation of Customary International Law
- Panel 5.1.2 / Mariana Clara de Andrade / Identification of and Resort to Customary International Law by the WTO Appellate Body
- Panel 5.1.1 / Riccardo di Marco / Customary International Law: a Foreword to Identification v. Interpretation
- Panel 4.2.4 / Nina Mileva / Old, New, Borrowed, or Blue: How can we Learn from the Interpretive Practices of Domestic Courts?
- Panel 4.2.3 / Gerard Hoogers / Customary International Law as a Tool for Federal Dispute Settlement: the Surprising Relevance of Customary International Law for the Domestic Legal Order in Germany and Austria
- Panel 4.2.2 / Luigi Crema / Once You Reach the Top of a Positivized Legal System, Customary Law Emerges Again. Hints from the Italian Constitutional Court
- Panel 4.2.1 / Cedric Ryngaert / From Customary Law Ascertainment to Interpretation: the Role of Domestic Courts
- Panel 4.1.4 / Fabian Augusto Cárdenas Castañeda / Interpreting CIL as an Argumentative Construct
- Panel 4.1.3 / Orfeas Chasapis-Tassinis / Interpreting State Practice and Interpreting the Rules of Customary International Law: Practical Relevance and Theoretical Reflection
- Panel 4.1.2 / John R Morss / The Interpretation of Customary International Law: Some Questions
- Panel 4.1.1 / Panos Merkouris / The Viability of and Need for Interpretation of Customary International Law
- Panel 3.2.4 / Zhuo Liang / The Practice of Non-state Armed Groups and the Formation of Customary International Humanitarian Law: Towards a Direct Relevance?
- Panel 3.2.3 / Maiko Meguro / Behind the Fiction of Opinio Juris: the Actors that Actually Create International Law
- Panel 3.2.2 / Machiko Kanetake / Critical Analysis of the Formation of Customary International Security Law
- Panel 3.2.1 / Catherine Brölmann / Is the Classical Paradigm of State Practice and Opinio Juris Still Valid Today?
- Panel 3.1.4 / Markus P. Beham / State Interest and Customary International Law – Identifying Custom Through International Relations
- Panel 3.1.3 / Frederick Cowell / Can Customary International Law emerge from Universal Periodic Review recommendations? A Democratic-Constructivist Theory
- Panel 3.1.2 / Anna Irene Baka / The Phenomenology of Absence in Customary International Law
- Panel 3.1.1 / David Howard / An Alternate Theory of Customary International Law
- Panel 2.2.3 / Asif Hameed / Particular vs General Rules: A Major Faultline for Customary International Law
- Panel 2.2.2 / Max H. Mayer / Law and its Other: The Making of Customary International Law
- Panel 2.2.1 / Andreas Føllesdal / Whence the Legitimate Authority of Customary International Law: to Honor State Consent, or Legitimate Expectations – or Both?
- Panel 2.1.4 / Andreas Hadjigeorgiou / Beyond Formalism: Reviving the Legacy of Sir Henry Maine for Customary International Law
- Panel 2.1.3 / Timothy William Waters / Tools to Match Desire: Customary International Law’s Plastic Hypocrisy
- Panel 2.1.2 / Francesca Iurlaro / The Fiction of Customary International Law: an Historical and Theoretical Perspective
- Panel 2.1.1 / Noora Arajärvi / Misinterpreting Customary International Law: Corrupt Pedigree or Self-fulfilling Prophecy?
- Panel 1.0.4 / Romel Regalado Bagares / Enkapsis and the Development of Customary International Law: A Dooyeweerdian Approach
- Panel 1.0.3 / Diego Mejía-Lemos / Customary International Law and the Regulation of the Sources of International Law
- Panel 1.0.2 / Jean d’Aspremont / The Four Lives of Customary International Law
- Panel 1.0.1 / Jörg Kammerhofer / The Theory of Customary International Law after the ILC Project: Between Pragmatism and Disenchantment
- Workshop 1.10 / Emily Sipiorski / The Interpretation of Good Faith Performance in International Investment Law: Additions to Justice?
